NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 109 LGERA 244
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Crosland v North Sydney Council [2000] NSWLEC 165 APPLICANT: Crosland PARTIES : RESPONDENT: North Sydney Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10435 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- whether proposed development permissible as a "health centre". LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97 Doyle v Newcastle City Council (1990) 71 LGRA 55; Foote v Willoughby Municipal Council (1985) 18 Aust Planning Appeal Decisions 9; Gilderthorpe v Sutherland [2000] NSWLEC 153; CASES CITED: House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council (2000) 106 LGERA 440 at 447; Pittwater Municipal Council v Peterson and Warta Holdings Pty Ltd, Talbot J (unreported 6 May 1993); Provincial Insurance Australia Pty Ltd v Consolidated Wool Products Pty Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 541; Woollahra Municipal Council v Carr (1982) 47LGRA 105 DATES OF HEARING: 20th July 2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2000
APPLICANT: Mr P D McClellan QC SOLICITORS J P O'Neill LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A Galasso, Barrister SOLCITORS Malleson Stephen Jacques
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 10435 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 2 August 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate