NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Rail Corporation New South Wales and Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union, New South Wales [2008] NSWIRComm 101
RAIL CORPORATION NEW SOUTH WALES Appellant PARTIES: AUSTRALIAN RAIL, TRAM AND BUS INDUSTRY UNION, NEW SOUTH WALES Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 228 of 2008
CORAM: Schmidt J at 1; Staff J at 1; McKenna C at 68
CATCHWORDS: Appeal - leave to appeal and appeal a decision - long-running dispute about classification - question posed interpretation of unregistered industrial agreement - submissions indicated decision would be accepted - no jurisdictional impediment to an appeal - recommendation made in arbitral proceedings - consideration of arbitral proceedings under s 136 and interpretation of an instrument under s 175 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - rights of appeal under s 187 considered - industrially pragmatic result of the consideration - error demonstrated - leave to appeal granted - appeal upheld - recommendation made set aside
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Industrial Relations Commission Rules
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union, New South Wales Branch v Rail Corporation NSW [2008] NSWIRComm 14 CASES CITED: Davies v Kyogle Council [2008] NSWIRComm 90 State Rail Authority of New South Wales and Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (C No. 20712 of 2000, 10 May 2000)
HEARING DATES: 23 April 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23 May 2008
APPELLANT: Mr PM Kite SC SOLICITORS: Blake Dawson Waldron LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms L Carruthers Research, Industrial Officer AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRAM AND BUS UNION, NSW
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate