NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: ALHMWU New South Wales Branch (o-b Malcolm Koopman) v Tasman Insulation Australia Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 1046
APPLICANT ALHMWU (o/b Malcolm Koopman) PARTIES: RESPONDENT Tasman Insulation Australia Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): 2984 of 2005
CORAM: Macdonald C
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
CASES CITED: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Pastrycooks Employees, Biscuit Makers Employees and Flour and Sugar Goods Workers Union v Gartrell White (No 3) (1990) 35 IR 70
HEARING DATES: 05/12/05, 06/12/05
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/04/2006
APPLICANT Mr M Vance (union official) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Price (Industrial Advocate)
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: COMMISSIONER MACDONALD
4 May 2006
Matter No IRC 2984 of 2005
Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union, New South Wales Branch (on behalf of Malcolm Koopman) and Tasman Insulation Australia Pty Ltd
Application by Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union, New South Wales Branch on behalf of its member Malcolm Koopman re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm 1046
1 The Commission has before it an application by Malcolm Koopman ("the Applicant") for unfair dismissal against Tasman Insulation Australia Pty Ltd ("the Respondent") pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 ("the Act").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate