NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Kringas v Cooma-Monaro Shire Council [2000] NSWLEC 53 APPLICANT Kringas PARTIES : RESPONDENT Cooma-Monaro Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10200 of 1999 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Development - Question of Law :- Whether the proposed rural subdivision is permissible pursuant to the provisions of the LEP LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Roads Act 1993 Kingston v Keprose Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 404 (CA); Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; Re The Licensing Ordinance (1968) 13 FLR 143 ; CASES CITED: Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Corp [1969] 2 WLR 163 ; R v Thierault (1951) 28 MPR 412 ; AGFA-Gevaert Ltd v Collector of Customs and Anor (1994) 124 ALR 645; Butler and Baker's Case 3 Rep 25a at 30b; 76 ER 684 DATES OF HEARING: 6/03/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/17/2000
APPLICANT Mr A Bradbury (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS Minter Ellison LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr W Marks (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Last and Maxwell
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 10200 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 17/03/99
Kringas Applicant v Cooma-Monaro Shire Council Respondent JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate