NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Auscare Corporation Pty Ltd v New South Wales Department of Commerce [2007] NSWIRComm 271
APPELLANT: Auscare Corporation Pty Ltd PARTIES: RESPONDENT: New South Wales Department of Commerce
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 372 of 2007
CORAM: Walton J Vice-President at [1]; Schmidt J at [29]; Staff J at [1]
CATCHWORDS: Appeal - conviction for breach of award - sentencing - challenge to penalty - denial of procedural fairness - assistance required to be given to unrepresented litigant - whether denial of procedural fairness should result in appeal being upheld - whether conceivable penalty could be altered - principles on sentencing where breach of award - question as to whether exercise of discretion might result in no penalty - procedurally fair trial may have made a difference - whether appropriate to remit on sentence - decision against remitter - powers of Full Bench to set aside or vary penalty - powers of Full Bench to admit fresh evidence on penalty on appeal - desirability of Full Bench hearing penalty and not referring - leave granted so far as required - appeal upheld - penalty quashed - matter programmed for hearing - costs reserved
Crimes (Local Courts Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Fines Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Arbitration Act 1940 Industrial Relations Act 1996 Justices Legislation Repeal and Amendment Act 2001 Local Courts Act 1982 Workplace Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate