NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Gosford City Council [2000] NSWLEC 154 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Gosford City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 50013 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Environmental Offences :- failure to comply with instructions on pesticide label - mitigating factors where employee responsible LEGISLATION CITED: Pesticides Act 1978 s 33(1), s 62 CASES CITED: R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245; R v Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 DATES OF HEARING: 26/06/2000 EX TEMPORE 06/26/2000 JUDGMENT DATE :
PROSECUTOR: Mr W G Roser (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr P J Donnellan (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: P J Donnellan & Co
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50013 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 26 June, 2000
Environment Protection Authority Prosecutor v Gosford City Council Defendant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. Gosford City Council is charged that it committed an offence against the Pesticides Act 1978 ("the Act") by disregarding instructions on a label of a registered pesticide in that it carelessly disregarded the instruction on the label which was affixed to a container used for the purpose of treating an infestation of army grubs on the oval at the Kincumber High School, contrary to s 33(1) of the Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate