NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Vic Cherikoff Food Services Pty Ltd v Cherikoff Rare Spices Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWIRComm 57
Vic Cherikoff Food Services Pty Ltd (First applicant) Vic Cherikoff (Second applicant) PARTIES: Cherikoff Rare Spices Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (First respondent) Frederick Theodore Gulson (Second respondent) John Stephen Bax (Third respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 6408 of 2002
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: COSTS - unfair contract proceedings - removal of first applicant from proceedings - summons amended - whether court should depart from well established principle that costs follow the event - risk and cost of initiating litigation - respondent awarded costs thrown away by reason of the amendment directed only to legal work that would otherwise not have been undertaken - orders made
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 - s 105, s 106,
Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Limited (2006) 225 CLR 180 CASES CITED: Laguillo v Haden Engineering Pty Ltd [1978] 1 NSWLR 306 Solution 6 Holdings Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission (NSW) (2004) 60 NSWLR 558
HEARING DATES: 13 April 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7 May 2010
Mr D Stewart of counsel (First and second applicant) Solicitors Kells The Lawyers
Mr M Seck of counsel (Second respondent) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Solicitors Cordato Partners
Mr R Alkadamani of counsel (Third respondent) Solicitors Haywards Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate