NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Mullins v Dept. of Education and Training [2006] NSWIRComm 1136
APPLICANT: PARTIES: Mr. Keith Mullins RESPONDENT: Dept. of Education and Training
FILE NUMBER(S): 5948 of 2005; 2784 of 2006 of
CORAM: Ritchie C
Application for unfair dismissal-constructive dismissal Application for reinstatement of injured employee Applications joined, to hear threshold jurisdictional argument by respondent. CATCHWORDS: Respondent stated that applicant had neither been terminated nor had he resigned. Applicant confirmed that he had not been terminated nor had he resigned. Sought from the Commission to investigate particular work issues. Commission found that as there had neither been a termination by the respondent nor had there been a resignation by the applicant ,the applicant was not an eligible employee to bring action under s.84 and or s. 92 of the Act. Applications dismissed.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act, 1996
CASES CITED: Allison v Bega Valley Council 63IR 68
HEARING DATES: 06/09/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/2006
APPLICANT Mr K Mullens LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr P. Newall of Counsel Mr P. Quinn of the respondent.
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Ritchie C.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate