NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 121 LGERA 383
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wunsch and [Nine] Others v Rockdale City Council and Another [2002] NSWLEC 103 APPLICANTS Bertrum Antonius Wunsch and Nine Others
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Rockdale City Council
SECOND RESPONDENT Mahmoud Mohanna
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40041 of 2002 CORAM: Talbot J Development Consent :- review of characterisation of development by the consent authority KEY ISSUES: Development :- whether prohibited by inclusion of second storey described as an attic Words and Phrases :- meaning of "storey" "attic" and "roof pitch" North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1989 LEGISLATION CITED: Rockdale Local Environmental Plan 2000 South Sydney Development Control Plan 1997: Urban Design Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139; Carey v North Sydney Council [1999] NSWLEC 174, unreported; Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Limited (1995-1996) 186 CLR 389); Da Costa v Cockburn Salvage & Trading Pty Ltd (1970) 124 CLR 192; CASES CITED: Hope v The Council of the City of Bathurst (1981) 144 CLR 1; Londish v Knox Grammar School and Others (1997) 97 LGERA 1; Pipheron Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council [2000] NSWLEC 65, unreported; Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL and Others (1999) 46 NSWLR 55; WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Hughes) v A.V. Jennings Limited T/as A.V. Jennings (Peterson J, NSWIRComm, 19 September 1997, unreported) DATES OF HEARING: 19/06/2002, 20/06/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/28/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate