NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Newcastle City Council v Reed Constructions Australia Pty Ltd [2000] NSWLEC 208 PROSECUTOR: Newcastle City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Reed Constructions Australia Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 50021 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- plea of guilty - utilitarian value of guilty plea - contrition LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 76A(1), s 125(1) Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (NSWCCA, 22 November 1993, unreported); CASES CITED: R v H (1980) 3 A Crim R 53; R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309 DATES OF HEARING: 12/09/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/27/2000
PROSECUTOR: Mr T G Howard (Barrister)
SOLICITORS: Harris Wheeler LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr S R Norrish QC
SOLICITORS: Heaney Richardson & Nemes
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50021 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 27 September, 2000
Newcastle City Council Prosecutor v Reed Constructions Australia Pty Ltd Defendant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. The defendant is a building construction company which appears to answer the charge that it has committed an offence against the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ("the EP&A Act") by carrying out development on Sunday 19 December 1999, at Mayfield, in breach of a condition of development consent, contrary to s 76A(1) and s 125(1) of the EP&A Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate