NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Australian Salaried Medical Officers' Federation (New South Wales) (on behalf of Bruce Milne Hall) v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2007] NSWIRComm 175
APPELLANT Australian Salaried Medical Officers' Federation (New South Wales) (on behalf of Bruce Milne Hall) PARTIES: RESPONDENT Sydney South West Area Health Service
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2200 of 2006
CORAM: Wright J President; Walton J Vice-President; Boland J
Appeal - Unfair dismissal - Practice and procedure - Clinical academic employed by University - Claim that also employed at the same time by Area Health Service - Claim that Area Health Service had unfairly dismissed applicant - Decision at first instance to dismiss unfair dismissal claim on the ground that there was no intention to create legal relations and so no contract existed between applicant and respondent Area Health Service - Decision appealed - New evidence following handing down of judgment at first instance and prior to finalisation of appeal - Parties sought to have appeal upheld and the matter remitted to a single member to deal with new evidence - Disagreement over whether remitter should be limited to jurisdictional issue or both merit and jurisdiction - New evidence of a limited nature - Full Bench to hear new evidence and determine appeal
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal - Appeal - Practice and procedure - Clinical academic employed by University - Claim that also employed at the same time by Area Health Service - Claim that Area Health Service had unfairly dismissed applicant - Decision at first instance to dismiss unfair dismissal claim on the ground that there was no intention to create legal relations and so no contract existed between applicant and respondent Area Health Service - Decision appealed - New evidence following handing down of judgment at first instance and prior to finalisation of appeal - Parties sought to have appeal upheld and the matter remitted to a single member to deal with new evidence - Disagreement over whether remitter should be limited to jurisdictional issue or both merit and jurisdiction - New evidence of a limited nature - Full Bench to hear new evidence and determine appeal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate