NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Linda Iris Neeson v Amora Company Limited & ors [2007] NSWIRComm 25
APPLICANT Linda Iris Neeson
FIRST RESPONDENT Amora Company Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Amora Group Pty Ltd (ACN 112 177 885) PARTIES: THIRD RESPONDENT Dr Taapun Siriphatrawan
FOURTH RESPONDENT Philip Johnson
FIFTH RESPONDENT Amalgamated Holdings Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 3417 of 2005
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: Proposed further amended summons - whether refererence to earlier contract for first time in proceedings - whether amendment time barred by reason of provisions of s 108B. HELD: Necessary to determine subject matter of amended summons - applications of rule 18A - specification - principal claim directed to a contract, arrangement or collateral arrangement between applicant and the respondents - failure to comply with rule 18A not ipso facto a nullity - leave granted - costs reserved.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Written Submissions: HEARING DATES: Applicant: 20/10/2006 Respondent: 15/12/2006 Applicant: 22/12/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16 February 2007
APPLICANT Mr J Murphy of counsel SOLICITOR: Mr Chris McArdle McArdle Legal
FIRST RESPONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: No Appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate