NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Inspector Nathan Hamilton v Thiess Pty Ltd and Ors [2009] NSWIRComm 41
PROSECUTOR: Inspector Nathan Hamilton
PARTIES: DEFENDANTS: Thiess Pty Ltd John Holland Pty Ltd Pells Sullivan Meynink Pty Ltd Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1987; 1988; 1989; 1990; 1991; 1992; 1993 and 1994 of 2007
CORAM: Backman J
CATCHWORDS: Application by prosecutor that proceedings under s 8(1) and s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 be heard jointly - application opposed - application granted - orders
LEGISLATION CITED: Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000
HEARING DATES: 23 March 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25 March 2009
PROSECUTOR: Mr R Reitano of counsel Solicitors: WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Ms F Miller)
DEFENDANT (Thiess): Ms L Constantine Solicitors: Blake Dawson Lawyers (Ms L Constantine)
DEFENDANT (John Holland): LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr G McGrath of counsel Solicitors: Herbert Geer & Rundle, Solicitors (Mr R Lund)
DEFENDANT (Pells Sullivan Meynink): Ms K Wilson Solicitors: Kennedys Lawyers (Mr A A Howie)
DEFENDANT (Parsons Brinckerhoff): Mr B D Hodgkinson of senior counsel Solicitors: Middletons Lawyers (Mr G Phillips)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate