NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Shell Co of Australia Ltd [2000] NSWLEC 132 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Shell Company of Australia Ltd (The) FILE NUMBER(S) : 50071 of 1997 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Environmental Offences :- Negligently cause substance to leak in a manner likely to harm the Environment. Hydrocarbon contamination of Service Station site. Circumstantial evidence case—whether there is a reasonable doubt that Defendant did not commit offence. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989 s 6(1) Burnie Port Authority v Gerard Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 179 CLR 520; Empress Car Co (Abertillery) Ltd v National Rivers Authority (1998) 1 AllER 471; Environment Protection Authority v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (2000) NSWLEC 6; Ghazal v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1992) 29 NSWLR 336; CASES CITED: Ghazal v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1992) 29 NSWLR 336 at 343; Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; Kondis v State Transport Authority (1984) 154 CLR 672; New South Wales Sugar Milling Co-Operative Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1992) 75LGRA 320; Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris (1997) 188 CLR 313· Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 at 578 DATES OF HEARING: 18/11/99-30/11/99, 1/12/99-17/12/99, 31/01/00, 02/02/00-04/02/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/30/2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate