NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Canosa v Penrith Nepean United Soccer Club [2007] NSWIRComm 1060
APPLICANT PARTIES: Claudio Marcelo Canosa RESPONDENT Penrith Nepean United Soccer Club
FILE NUMBER(S): 423 of 2007
CORAM: Cambridge C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal - termination of employment - employer failure to properly attend to defence of claim - extempore decision - dismissal held as harsh, unreasonable and unjust - compensation Ordered.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW]
HEARING DATES: 17/09/07, 25/09/07
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25 September 2007
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 25 September 2007
APPLICANT Self represented LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr Bruce Smith
DECISION: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE
25 September 2007
Matter No IRC 423 of 2007
Claudio Marcelo Canosa v Penrith Nepean United Soccer Club
Application by C M Canosa re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
EXTEMPORE DECISION
[2007] NSWIRComm 1060
1 This matter involves a claim for unfair dismissal. The claim was made pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW], (the Act). The claim was filed on 12 April 2007, by Claudio Marcelo Canosa (the applicant), and named the respondent employer as Penrith Nepean United Soccer Club also referred to as Penrith Nepean United Football Club (the employer).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate