NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sumar Produce Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2000] NSWLEC 27 APPLICANT: Sumar Produce Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Griffith City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10705 of 1999; 11121 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- statutory construction - power to vary noise control notice after appeal - power to vary noise control notice on appeal - power of delegation to council officer Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39 LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s 337 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 264, s 265, s 266. s 267 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 08/02/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/15/2000
APPLICANT: Mrs J Kelly (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Commins Hendricks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A Hawkes (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Pike Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 10705 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT And: 11121 of 1999 OF NEW SOUTH WALES Coram: Talbot J Decision Date: 15 February, 2000
Sumar Produce Pty Ltd Applicant v Griffith City Council Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. These two proceedings relate to an appeal against the respondent council's noise control notice first issued on 1 September 1999 and varied by a further notice on 29 November 1999. Each notice is the subject of a separate appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate