NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited v. Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, Australian Workers Union and Electrical Trades Union of Australia [2006] NSWIRComm 1022
APPLICANT Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Limited
FIRST RESPONDENT Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union PARTIES: SECOND RESPONDENT Australian Workers Union
THIRD RESPONDENT Electrical Trades Union of Australia
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 234 and 235 of 2006
CORAM: Connor C
CATCHWORDS: application for new awards - consent of parties - awards made - compliance with requirements for making awards
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 06/02/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/06/2006
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/06/2006
APPLICANT Peter Punch Carroll and O'Dea, Lawyers
FIRST RESPONDENT Brad Hattenfels LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union
SECOND RESPONDENT Dave Hancock Australian Workers Union
THIRD RESPONDENT John Thornton Electrical Trades Union of Australia
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate