NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hofer v Howell Developments Pty Limited [No. 2] [2001] NSWLEC 42 APPLICANT: Victoria Hofer PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Howell Developments Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 30218 of 1999 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- indemnity costs - Calderbank letters -costs in proceedings under the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 Encroahment of Buildings Act 1922 s 14 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Supreme Court Rules Pt 52, r 17(4) Droga & Ors v Proprietors of Strata Plan 51722, NSWLEC, Bignold J, 28 November 1997, unreported; Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Limited v International Produce Merchants Pty Limited & Ors (1988) 81 ALR 397; Hofer v Howell Developments Pty Limited [2000] NSWLEC 191, unreported; MGICA (1992) Limited v Kenny & Good Pty Limited [No. 4] (1996) 140 ALR 707; CASES CITED: Multicon Engineering Pty Limited v Federal Airports Corporation (1996) 138 ALR 425; Nobrega v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney [No. 2] [1999] NSWCA 133; Port Stephens Council v Randell [2000] NSWLEC 169; Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Limited (1996) 141 ALR 727; Rosniak v GIO (1997) 41 NSWLR 608; Sanko Steamship Company Limited v Sumioto Australia Limited, Federal Court, Sheppard J, 7 February 1996, unreported DATES OF HEARING: 01/11/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/21/2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate