NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Penrith City Council v Re-Gen Industries Pty Ltd [2000] NSWLEC 82 PROSECUTOR: Penrith City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Re-Gen Industries Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 50081 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- effect of s 10 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 in contrast to former s 556A Crimes Act 1900 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 76A LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 s 556A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10 CASES CITED: Cooper v Coffs Harbour City Council (1997) 97 LGERA 125; R v Ingrassia (1996) 41 NSWLR 447 DATES OF HEARING: 20/04/2000, 26/04/2000, 27/04/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/28/2000
PROSECUTOR: Mrs J C Kelly (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Gadens Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr M A Bradford (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Michael Siderowitz & Co
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50081 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 28 April, 2000
Penrith City Council Prosecutor v Re-Gen Industries Pty Ltd Defendant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. The defendant has entered a plea of guilty to the charge that on and between 29 April 1999 and 5 May 1999 it committed an offence against the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ("the EP&A Act") in that contrary to s 76A it carried out development without first having obtained development consent by clearing land at Luddenham Road, St Marys, including the removal of trees, shrubs and undergrowth.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate