NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Springer & Anor v Woollahra Municipal Council & Ors [2000] NSWLEC 135 APPLICANTS: Leslie Springer and Frederika Springer
FIRST RESPONDENT: Woollahra Municipal Council PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT: Bennet Architects & Associates Pty Limited
THIRD RESPONDENT: Catherine Cunio FILE NUMBER(S) : 40193 of 1999 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- whether determination of development application lawful - whether all relevant considerations assessed - whether any inconsistency between environmental planning instruments Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 23 cl 5 LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No. 53 cl 5, cl 16, cl 17, cl 19, cl 20, cl 31, Sch 5 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 cl 2, cl 5, cl 8, cl 19 Coffs Harbour Environment Centre Inc v The Minister (1994) 84 LGERA 324; Currey v Sutherland Shire Council (1998) 100 LGERA 365; Franklins Ltd v Penrith City Council [1999] NSWCA 134; Hortis v Manly Council (1999) 104 LGERA 43; CASES CITED: Lakeside Plaza Pty Ltd v Legal & General Properties No. 2 Ltd (1992) 76 LGERA 60; Marnal Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council (1989) 68 LGRA 135; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend (1986) 162 CLR 24; Schroders Australia Property Management Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [1999] NSWLEC 251; Somerville v Dalby (1990) 69 LGRA 422 DATES OF HEARING: 18/05/2000 and 19/05/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/29/2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate