NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Sleap & ABB Administrative Services Pty Ltd [2005] NSWIRComm 1193
APPLICANT: Mr. Paul Sleap PARTIES: RESPONDENT: ABB Administrative Services Pty Ltd.
FILE NUMBER(S): 1987 of 2005
CORAM: Ritchie C
Unfair dismissal claim Respondent sought a non-disclosure order under s. 164A of IRAct. Application opposed by applicant. Witness to be, would not give evidence unless non-disclosure order in place. Respondent believe evidence to be given by witness vital to their case. CATCHWORDS: Could not make an application under s.128 of the Evidence Act because Commission as constituted is not a Court. Commission satisfied that based on submissions that orders be made in the interests of justice. Orders made as originally applied for and not as sought to be varied by the respondent. Believe orders originally applied for protect both witness and applicant.
Industrial Relations Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995
HEARING DATES: 11/18/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/22/2005
APPLICANT: Mr.O'Sullivan from Turner Freeman LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr Robinson from Fisher Cartwright Berriman
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Ritchie C.
22 November 2005
Matter No IRC 1987of 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate