NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mackenzie v Warringah Council [2002] NSWLEC 131 APPLICANT Luke James Mackenzie PARTIES : RESPONDENT Warringah Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10760 of 2002 CORAM: Pain J Construction and Interpretation :- construction of Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000 desired future character statement KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- appeal against refusal - merit considerations LEGISLATION CITED: Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000 Bodyline Spa & Sauna (Sydney) Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 432 ; Coffs Harbour Environment Centre Inc v Coffs Harbour City Council (1991) 74 LGRA 185 ; CASES CITED: Hospital Action Group Association Inc v Hastings Municipal Council (1993) 80 LGERA 190; Kanne Pty Ltd v Botany Bay City Council [2001] NSWLEC 163 ; Marchese Partners Architects Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2002] NSWLEC 31; Schaffer Corporation Ltd v Hawkesbury City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 21 DATES OF HEARING: 9-13/04/2002, 03/06/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/2002
APPLICANT Mr DR Parry (barrister) SOLICITORS N/A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr D Wilson (barrister) SOLICITORS Wilshire Webb
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 10760 of 2002 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Pain J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 8 August 2002.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate