NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Howland -v- Cement Australia [2006] NSWIRComm 1107
APPLICANT PARTIES: Kerry John Howland RESPONDENT Cement Australia Pty ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): 6293 of 2005
CORAM: Cambridge C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal - termination of employment - summary dismissal - industrial dispute - dismissal for breach of safety procedure - stated policy of employer - extraneous issues promoted decision to dismiss - procedure - no hearing before decision maker - no evidence led from decision maker - dismissal held as harsh, unreasonable and unjust - reinstatement Ordered.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW]
HEARING DATES: 20/06/06,21/06/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/07/2006
APPLICANT Mr I Morrison with Mr V Overton from the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, New South Wales Branch.
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Benson, barrister, with Mr A Powter, solicitor Solicitors for Respondent Gillis Delaney Lawyers
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE
7 July 2006
Matter No IRC 6293 of 2005
Kerry John Howland -v- Cement Australia Pty Ltd
Application by K Howland pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 re unfair dismissal.
DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm 1107
1 This matter involves a claim for unfair dismissal. The claim was made pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW], (the Act). The claim was filed on 2 December 2005, by the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, New South Wales Branch, (the AMWU), on behalf of Kerry John Howland (the applicant), and named the respondent employer as Cement Australia Pty Ltd (the employer).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate