NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hawkesbury City Council and Another v Sammut [2000] NSWLEC 246 FIRST APPLICANT: Hawkesbury City Council
PARTIES : SECOND APPLICANT: John Hagar
RESPONDENT: Daniel Sammut FILE NUMBER(S) : 40202 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- whether practice or policy of notification gives rise to expectation of notice - extent to which notice issued satisfies obligation to notify and invite submissions LEGISLATION CITED: Canterbury District Residents and Ratepayers Association Inc v Canterbury Municipal Council & Anor (1991) 73 LGRA 317; Egan & Ors v Hawkesbury City Council & Anor (1993) 79 LGERA 321; CASES CITED: Hardi v Woollahra Municipal Council & Wasserman (Cripps J, NSWLEC, 17 December 1987, unreported); Litevale Pty Ltd v Lismore City Council (1997) 96 LGERA 91; Rapid Transport Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council & Ors (1987) 62 LGRA 88; Somerville v Dalby & Ors (1990) 69 LGRA 422 DATES OF HEARING: 16/11/2000, 17/11/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/30/2000
FIRST APPLICANT: Mr G B Newport (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout
SECOND APPLICANT: Mr G J Kennedy (Barrister) with Ms N Gilchrist (Barrister) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS: Axtens & Co
RESPONDENT: Mr P C Tomasetti (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Storey & Gough
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate