NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Darc Rasmussen v Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd & ors (No. 4) [2006] NSWIRComm 225
APPLICANT Darc Rasmussen
FIRST RESPONDENT Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd (formerly Sulcus (Australia) Pty Ltd) (ACN 053 993 025)
SECOND RESPONDENT Christopher Ian Gribble PARTIES: THIRD RESPONDENT Jo- Ann Schlein
FOURTH RESPONDENT John Picardi
FIFTH RESPONDENT Verso Technologies (Formerly Eltrax Systems Inc)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 4276 of 2001
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: Two conflicting Notice of Motions – applicant sought leave to proceed against non submitting foreign respondent –applicants solicitor effected service of 2nd amended summons through agent based in foreign country - applicants solicitor served motion via letter – fifth respondent argued no proper service of either, the Court had no jurisdiction & applicant's motion be dismissed - whether particular documentation furnished to Court in the appropriate form. Held: Applicant's motion upheld – need for evidence of proper service applies to 2nd amended summons only – effected according to the law of that country – internet publication reliable source of information – motion served with confirmation of receipt – position taken by respondent, that applicant must prove strictly questions of service and compliance with foreign law not acceptable in contemporary times – fifth respondent's motion dismissed.
Evidence Act 1995 Industrial Relations Act 1996 Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Profession Act 1987 Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate