NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Inghams Enterprises (Cardiff) Enterprise Agreement 2005 [2006] NSWIRComm 60
PARTIES: Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union, Newcastle and Northern Branch
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 308 of 2006
CORAM: Harrison DP
CATCHWORDS: Application for approval of enterprise agreement - poultry processing plant - to apply for period of three years - agreement approved
HEARING DATES: 03/02/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/27/2006
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 02/03/2006
APPLICANT Mr I George LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Ms K Radnidge
JUDGMENT:
- 2 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: HARRISON DP
27 February 2006
Matter No IRC 308 of 2006
INGHAMS ENTERPRISES (CARDIFF) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2005
Application by Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited for approval of enterprise agreement
DECISION [2006] NSWIRComm 60
1 This is an application by Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited("the Company") seeking approval of an enterprise agreement between the Company and the Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union, Newcastle and Northern Branch ("the Union") to apply to employees of the Company's Cardiff Processing Plant. 2 The application was subject to hearing on 3 February 2006. Mr I George appeared on behalf of the Company. Ms K Radnidge appeared on behalf of the Union.
3 The application is supported by the necessary Statement of Particulars, and an affidavit signed by Mr J Jones, Director of Jones Ross, Industrial Relations Consultants to the Company, deposing that the agreement complies with all relevant statutory requirements, satisfies the no net detriment test and was not entered into under duress.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate