NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Cahill v State of New South Wales (Department of Education and Training and Department of Juvenile Justice) [2007] NSWIRComm 105
PROSECUTOR: John Joseph Cahill PARTIES: DEFENDANT: State of New South Wales (Department of Education and Training and Department of Juvenile Justice)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1390, 1391, 1392 of 2006
CORAM: Schmidt J
CATCHWORDS: Occupational Health and Safety - evidence - expert opinion evidence - voir dire to determine admissibility of expert's report - evaluation of expert witness - evidence received
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000
Arnott's Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 24 FCR 313 Australian Securities & Investments Commission v John David Rich & Ors [2005] NSWCA 152 Barbosa v Di Meglio [1999] NSWCA 307 Collins Thomson v Clayton [2002] NSWSC 366 Evans Deakin Pty Ltd v Sebel Furniture Ltd [2003] FCA 171 Fagenblat v Feingolf Partners Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 454 FGT Custodians Pty Ltd v Fagenblat [2003] VSCA 33 CASES CITED: Kirch Communications Pty Ltd v Gene Engineering Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 485 Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd & 8 ors [2001] NSWSC 123 Li v Regina; Regina v Li [2003] NSWCCA 290 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) NSWLR 705 McMartin v Newcastle Wallsend Coal Company Pty Ltd & Ors [2003] NSWIRComm 292 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 Sydneywide Distributors v Red Bull Australia Pty Limited (2002) 55 IPR 354
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate