NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Police v O'Brien [2008] NSWLC 12
JURISDICTION: Criminal
PARTIES: Police O'Brien
FILE NUMBER:
PLACE OF HEARING: Bega Local Court
DATE OF DECISION: 06/18/2008
MAGISTRATE: Magistrate C Bone
CATCHWORDS: PCA - usual place of abode
LEGISLATION CITED: Sections 13, 15, 17 Road Transport (Safety and Traffic) Management Act 1999 Section 138 Evidence Act 1995
Bunning v. Cross DPP v. Skewes (2002 NSWSC 1008) DPP v. Linnett (2006 Supreme Court 1086, Buddin, J.). CASES CITED: Germolus v. Higginbotham (NSWSC unreported 12th November, 1993) Haberhauer v. Simek (1991 9 Petty Sessions Review 4235) In the Appeal of Lodge (NSWDC, Phelan DCJ, 24th April, 1992) Merchant v. The Queen Shenton v Hayhurst (NSWSC unrep 9 October 1992)
TEXTS CITED:
REPRESENTATION: Sgt. D. Pearce, police prosecutor, for the prosecutor Ms. R. Chalmers, solicitor, for the accused
ORDERS:
Reasons for Decision
1 It is alleged against the accused, Matthew James O'Brien, that he drove a motor vehicle at Bega on 25th December, 2007, while there was present in his blood the high range prescribed concentration of alcohol (HRPCA). The solicitor for the accused indicated at the commencement of the case that there would be an objection to the admissibility of the breath analysis certificate and that that objection would be based on the fact that the breath test and arrest of the accused had occurred at his home. A deal of the evidence which I subsequently heard was taken on the "voire dire" in order to properly consider the objection.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate