NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sutherland Shire Council v Signorelli Investments Pty Ltd and Anor [2000] NSWLEC 77 PROSECUTOR: Sutherland Shire Council PARTIES : DEFENDANTS: Signorelli Investments Pty Ltd Monte Cristo Lounge Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 50091 of 1999; 50092 of 1999; 50095 of 1999; 50096 of 1999; 50097 of 1999; 50098 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- standard of proof for circumstantial evidence - failure of accused to give evidence - failure of prosecution to call a witness it might be expected to call LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 76A, s 76B, s 125 Argyropoulos v Canterbury Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGRA 202; Chamberlain and Anor v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; CASES CITED: Jones v Dunkel and Anor (1959) 101 CLR 298; RPS v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 449; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; Weissensteiner v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 217 DATES OF HEARING: 10/04/2000, 11/04/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/19/2000
PROSECUTOR: Mr J E Robson (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANTS: Mr T S Hale SC with Mr T M Thawley (Barrister) SOLICITORS: The Law Firm of Solari's
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter Nos. 50091-2; 50095-8 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 19 April, 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate