NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Sinadinos v EDI Rail Pty Limited [2008] NSWIRComm 252
APPELLANT: Tas Sinadinos PARTIES: RESPONDENT: EDI Rail Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 513 of 2008
CORAM: Boland J President; Walton J Vice-President; Kavanagh J
CATCHWORDS: Appeal - unfair contract jurisdiction - costs - Notice of Contention - Sydney Water - serious misconduct - summary termination - no issues of law or principle attracting leave - proper basis to summarily dismiss - Contention made out - costs within discretion - leave refused
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
King v State Bank of New South Wales (No 2) (2002) 126 IR 407 CASES CITED: Knowles v Anglican Property Trust (No 2) (2000) 95 IR 380 Sydney Water Corporation v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales (2004) 61 NSWLR 661
TEXTS CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 18 December 2008 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 18 December 2008
APPELLANT: Mr P Coleman of counsel Solicitors: Carroll and Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A Moses SC with Mr B Miles of counsel Solicitors: Colin Biggers & Paisley
JUDGMENT:
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
FULL BENCH
CORAM: BOLAND J, President WALTON J, Vice-President KAVANAGH J
Thursday 18 December 2008
Matter No IRC 513 of 2008
TAS SINADINOS v EDI RAIL PTY LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate