NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Ian King v Regulatory Concepts Pty Limited & Anor [2006] NSWIRComm 310
APPLICANT: Ian King
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT: Regulatory Concepts Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT: Helena Wanda Dickenson
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 5181 of 2003
CORAM: Schmidt J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - IT industry - whether work performed by applicant was undertaken as an employee of first respondent or whether work performed was done on own account by way of investment - agreement to deferral of payment for work - work done for respondents - work never paid for - terms of agreement made - question as to the true size of shareholding - contract found unfair - money orders - superannuation - interest - costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
CASES CITED: GingerMeggs Pty Limited v Regulatory Concepts Pty Limited & Ors (unreported, Miller A, 23 September 2004) Stevenson v Barham (1977) 136 CLR 190
HEARING DATES: 24/03/06, 23/05/06, 25/06/06, 26/06/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/27/2006
APPLICANT: Mr D Shoebridge of counsel SOLICITORS: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Employment Lawyers
RESPONDENTS: Mr S Cairns of counsel
JUDGMENT:
- 47 - INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Schmidt J
27 September 2006
Matter No IRC 5181 of 2003
IAN KING V REGULATORY CONCEPTS PTY LIMITED AND ANOTHER Application under s.106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate