NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: NSW Nurses Association v North Coast Area Health Service [2008] NSWIRComm 1072
APPLICANT: PARTIES: New South Wales Nurses' Association RESPONDENT: North Coast Area Health Service
FILE NUMBER(S): 111; 507 of 2008
CORAM: Ritchie C
Section 130 Dispute notification by Union re failure to pay correct rate of pay. Employee employeed on two conescutive fixed term contracts,the first commencing on 19 February 2007 and the second ceasing on 10 February 2008. During second contract notifies employer that she is pregnant. Employee applies for paid maternity leave to commence on 21 January 2008. She sought payment of full benefit of 14 weeks but was only paid 3 weeks. Applicant submitted that as the employee is an eligible employee she must receive full benefit. Respondent argued that not required to pay benefit beyond 10 February 2008. Applicant argued that the plain ordinary meaning of the words in the maternity leave made no qualification concerning part payment. CATCHWORDS: Respondent argued that for leave to be paid there must exist a contract on foot. No contract existed beyond 10 February 2008. Commission found in favour of the applicant. Nothing in the clause supported the respondent's argument. Plain meaning of eligible employee noted who and who was not eligible. Employee in question was entitled to the full payment. Order made to that effect.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate