Lederer & Ors v Sydney City Council [2001] NSWLEC 272

Reported Decision : 119 LGERA 350

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

CITATION : Lederer & Ors v Sydney City Council [2001] NSWLEC 272 APPLICANTS: Andrew Lederer, Gizela Fiala & Hexiva Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10810 of 2000 CORAM: Lloyd J Development Consent :- advertisement and advertising structure - interpretation

KEY ISSUES: Existing Use Rights: -consent granted under repealed environmental planning instrument - consent remains in force - not capable of abandonment

Orders:- section 121B Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - advertisement or advertising structure - grounds for issue of order - interpretation - modification of order - inadequate reasons Central Sydney Development Control Plan 1996 cl 8 Central Sydney Heritage Local Environmental Plan 2000 cl7, cl 8 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 106, s 107, s 109, s 109B, s 121B, s 121H, s 121K, s 121L, s 121ZK Local Government Act 1919 Miscellaneous Acts (Planning) Repeal and Amendment Act 1979 Sch 3 cl 2(1) State Environmental Planning Policy No. 64 - Advertising and Signage cl 11, cl 22 ACR Trading Pty Ltd v Fat-Sel Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 67; Auburn Council v Nehme (1999) 106 LGERA 19; House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council (2000) 106 LGERA 440; North Sydney Municipal Council v Boyts Radio & Electrical Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 50; Ryde Municipal Council v The Royal Ryde Homes (1970) 19 LGRA 321 ; CASES CITED: Shannon v Lithgow City Council (1995) 88 LGERA 253; Shire of Perth v O'Keefe (1964) 110 CLR 529; Stutchbury v Pittwater Council (1999) 105 LGERA 1; Sydney Serviced Apartments v North Sydney Municipal Council [No. 2] (1993) 78 LGERA 404; Ulmarra Council v Clarence River County Council (1998) 101 LGERA 374; Van Haasteren v South Sydney Council (2000) 109 LGERA 252 DATES OF HEARING: 13/08/2001, 14/08/2001 and 15/08/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/03/2001