NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: DPP v Hodge [2008] NSWLC 3
JURISDICTION: Criminal
PARTIES: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) Gregory Arthur Hodge
FILE NUMBER:
PLACE OF HEARING: Downing Centre
DATE OF DECISION: 02/06/2008
MAGISTRATE: Chief Magistrate G L Henson
CATCHWORDS: Possess Child Pornography - Judgment on Application for Costs
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 Criminal Procedure Act 198
CASES CITED: Fosse –v- DPP [1999] NSWSC 367
TEXTS CITED:
REPRESENTATION:
ORDERS:
1. On 7th March 2007 Police executed a search warrant on premises occupied by the accused person. There is no issue raised in the context of this application that the search warrant was not validly obtained and appropriately exercised. From submissions made to the Court it would seem that a number of still images and video files were obtained from the personal computer belonging to the accused person. Whilst searching the house a set of knuckle-dusters was located under a bed. The accused person acknowledged knowledge and possession of this article. This acknowledgment was recorded electronically on the video recorder used to record the search of his premises. The accused was not arrested at this time. On 2nd April 2007 he was invited to participate in a record of interview. Exercising his right to silence he declined such invitation. Nothing adverse can be drawn from this circumstance.
2. Subsequently on 15th May 2007 the accused was served with Court Attendance Notices alleging the offences of possessing child pornography contrary to the provisions of Section 91H (3) of the Crimes Act 1900 and possessing a prohibited weapon contrary to the provisions of Section 7(1) of the Weapons Prohibition Act 1998.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate