NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fidler v Port Stephens Council [2000] NSWLEC 114 APPLICANT Fidler PARTIES : RESPONDENT Port Stephens Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 30156 of 1997 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Compensation :- hypothetical residential subdivision created having unique features - absence of directly comparable sales for four lots in hypothetical residential subdivision - comparable sales for one lot in hypothetical residential subdivision- gross value of hypothetical residential subdivision - profit and risk applicable to hypothetical residential subdivision - assessment of development costs for hypothetical residential subdivision- assessment of compensation. LEGISLATION CITED: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (SA) v Execution Trustee Agency Company of SA Limited (1942) 74 CLR 374; Hurdis v The Minister (1957) 2 LGRA 132 ; CASES CITED: Leichardt Municipal Council v Seatainer Terminals Pty Ltd (CA) (1981) 48 LGRA 409 ; Minister for Environment v Florence (1979) 21 SASR 108 ; Scarf & Ors v Canterbury Municipal Council unreported no 30279/88 9 August 1989; Turner & Anor v Minister of Public Instruction (1956) 95 CLR 245 DATES OF HEARING: 15/5/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/15/2000
APPLICANT Mr W Davison SC
SOLICITORS Clayton Utz LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Kildea (Barrister)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate