NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Armidale Local Aboriginal Land Council v Transgrid [2000] NSWLEC 141 APPLICANT: Armidale Local Aboriginal Land Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Transgrid FILE NUMBER(S) : 40073 of 2000 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Interlocutory Relief :- interlocutory injunction - application to restrain further works to protect indigenous heritage items - whether serious question to be tried - delay in making application - prejudice to third parties LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 115A, s 115B State Environmental Planning Policy No.4 CASES CITED: Castlemaine Tooheys Limited v The State of South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148 DATES OF HEARING: 17/05/2000 EX TEMPORE 05/17/2000 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT: T S Hale SC SOLICITORS: Beesley & Hughes LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: N A Hemmings QC (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Allen Allen & Hemsley
JUDGMENT: 1
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 40073 of 1996 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Lloyd J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision date: 17 May 2000
Armidale Local Aboriginal Land Council Applicant v Transgrid Respondent EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR: 1. The applicant applies for an interlocutory injunction restraining the respondent, which is a statutory corporation, from carrying out works in connection with the construction of an electricity transmission line within certain identified areas of land.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate