NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Croghan -V- Hawkesbury City Council [1999] NSWLEC 134
PARTIES APPLICANT: Croghan
RESPONDENT: Hawkesbury City Council
NUMBER: 30199 of 1995
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- whether the Applicant should be regarded as being substantially successful in the litigation—effect of certain agreements made between parties in course of litigation
LEGISLATION CITED: Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991
DATES OF HEARING: 04/21/1999
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 04/21/1999
APPLICANT: Mr P. Tomasetti, Barrister SOLICITORS; Mervyn J Cathers & Co. LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr D. Miller, Barrister SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 30199 of 1995 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 21 April 1999
ALAN FRANCIS CROGHAN
Applicant
v.
HAWKESBURY CITY COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
1. By its Motion filed on 4 March 1999 the Applicant seeks an order for costs in proceedings involving an objection pursuant to the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991 (Just Terms Act) in respect of the compulsory acquisition by the Council of land previously owned by the Applicant, by Compulsory Acquisition Notice published in the Government Gazette No.86 of 14 July 1995.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate