NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wechsler v Ku-ring-gai Council [2001] NSWLEC 216 APPLICANT PARTIES : Robert Wechsler RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10053 of 2001 CORAM: Sheahan J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- development consent - appeal against conditions - validity of s 94 contribution plan LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 94 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 Billbergia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2000] NSWLEC 94; Easeport Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (2001) 112 LGERA 376; King & Campbell Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council (2000) NSWLEC 11; CASES CITED: Levadetes & Anor v Hawkesbury Shire Council (1988) 67 LGRA 190; Parramatta City Council v Peterson (1987) 61 LGRA 286; Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (10911 of 1995, Pearlman J, 10 July 1996); S&I Investments Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (40026 of 1997, Sheahan J, 7 July 1997) DATES OF HEARING: 14/09/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/28/2001
APPLICANT Mr R Wechsler (in person) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Deacons Solicitors
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 10053 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Sheahan J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 28 September 2001
ROBERT WECHSLER Applicant v
KU-RING-GAI COUNCIL Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate