NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Lane and Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service [2006] NSWIRComm 380
APPELLANT Raymond George Lane PARTIES: RESPONDENT Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2534 of 2006
CORAM: Walton J Vice-President; Grayson DP; Staff J
Appeal - Leave to appeal - Termination of employment - Unfair dismissal - Employee dismissed for having pornographic material stored in his computer at work - Application dismissed at first instance - Deputy President failed to consider statutory test as to whether dismissal was harsh, unreasonable, unjust - Deputy President's failure to make finding relating to statutory test - Failure to answer questions arising - Whether Deputy President failed to take into account relevant considerations - Whether Deputy President took into account considerations such as the length of service of the appellant; his exemplary service to the community; commendations that he received both from within the Industry and from his employer; the likely impact on the appellant's prospects of finding future employment; the appellant's age; the appellant's impaired hearing and impaired sight; the appellant's very specialised skill base and what impact that may have on his ability to gain future employment - Failure of respondent to adequately take into account all disciplinary options or explain reasons for decision taken - Failure of Commission to take this omission into account - Failure of Commission to adequately have regard to employer's policy and inadequacies in same - Failure to resolve significance of out of hours conduct - Error of law and principle - Appeal upheld - Matter remitted - Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) - Section 84 CATCHWORDS: Termination of employment - Unfair dismissal - Appeal - Leave to Appeal - Employee dismissed for having pornographic material stored in his computer at work - Application dismissed at first instance - Deputy President failed to consider statutory test as to whether dismissal was harsh, unreasonable, unjust - Deputy President's failure to make finding relating to statutory test - Failure to answer questions arising - Whether Deputy President failed to take into account relevant considerations - Whether Deputy President took into account considerations such as the length of service of the appellant; his exemplary service to the community; commendations that he received both from within the Industry and from his employer; the likely impact on the appellant's prospects of finding future employment; the appellant's age; the appellant's impaired hearing and impaired sight; the appellant's very specialised skill base and what impact that may have on his ability to gain future employment - Failure of respondent to adequately take into account all disciplinary options or explain reasons for decision taken - Failure of Commission to take this omission into account - Failure of Commission to adequately have regard to employer's policy and inadequacies in same - Failure to resolve significance of out of hours conduct - Error of law and principle - Appeal upheld - Matter remitted - Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) - Section 84
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate