NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Newcastle Wallsend Coal Company Pty Limited & Ors v Stephen Finlay McMartin [2006] NSWIRComm 339 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPELLANTS Richard Porteous Newcastle Wallsend Coal Company Pty Limited Jonathan Romcke PARTIES: Oakbridge Pty Limited Mark Robinson
RESPONDENTS Stephen McMartin
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1591, 1592, 1593, 1594, 1595 of 2005
CORAM: Walton J Vice-President at [1]; Marks J at [633]; Boland J at [1]
Appeal - Occupational health and safety - Mine - Inrush of water - Death of four miners by drowning - Multiple prosecutions under Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Reliance by defendants on inaccurate plans showing wrong location of old workings full of water - Multiple failures to ensure safety - Two corporate defendants and three personal defendants found guilty at first instance of offences under s 15(1), s 16(1) and s 50(1) of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Sentences imposed - Appeals by all of the defendants - Whether proceedings at first instance a nullity- Autrefois convict - double jeopardy - Duplicity - Abuse of process - Elements of the offences - Essential factual elements of offences - Risk - Potential risk -Consideration of when risk arose - Implications for charges of when risk arose -Expert evidence - Whether trial judge entitled to rely on evidence of experts - Causation - Consideration of each of the alleged failures to ensure safety and whether any error at first instance - Derivative failures to ensure safety - Absolute liability - Whether statutory defences made out - Concerned in the management of the corporation - Sentencing - Totality - Consideration of penalties imposed at first instance - Section 10 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - Conduct of prosecutor - Section 51A of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Costs CATCHWORDS: Occupational health and safety - Appeal - Mine - Inrush of water - Death of four miners by drowning - Multiple prosecutions under Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Reliance by defendants on inaccurate plans showing wrong location of old workings full of water - Multiple failures to ensure safety - Two corporate defendants and three personal defendants found guilty at first instance of offences under s 15(1), s 16(1) and s 50(1) of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Sentences imposed - Appeals by all of the defendants - Whether proceedings at first instance a nullity- Autrefois convict - double jeopardy - Duplicity - Abuse of process - Elements of the offences - Essential factual elements of offences - Risk - Potential risk -Consideration of when risk arose - Implications for charges of when risk arose -Expert evidence - Whether trial judge entitled to rely on evidence of experts - Causation - Consideration of each of the alleged failures to ensure safety and whether any error at first instance - Derivative failures to ensure safety - Absolute liability - Whether statutory defences made out - Concerned in the management of the corporation - Sentencing - Totality - Consideration of penalties imposed at first instance - Section 10 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - Conduct of prosecutor - Section 51A of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate