NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 116 LGERA 312
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Marrickville Council v Admark Investments Pty Ltd & Anor [2001] NSWLEC 233 APPLICANT Marrickville Council
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Admark Investments Pty Ltd
SECOND RESPONDENT Portuguese Marble & Granite Pty Limited t/a Euro Abrasives
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40193 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- apportionment between owner and lessee following discontinuance after premises vacated. LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 15 r 7 Ashfield Municipal Council v Rex Keys Andrews and Others (1986) 60 LGRA 248; CASES CITED: Cumberland County Council v Corben and Pember (1960) 6 LGRA 66; Holroyd City Council v Murdoch (1994) 82 LGERA 197 DATES OF HEARING: 19/09/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/04/2001
APPLICANT Ms M.L. Hawley (Solicitor) SOLICITORS Phillips Fox
FIRST RESPONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr P.C. Tomasetti (Barrister) with Mr J.S. Whyte (Barrister) SOLICITORS J.S. Pinto & Co
SECOND RESPONDENT N/A
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40193 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 4 October 2001
Marrickville Council Applicant v Admark Investments Pty Ltd First Respondent Portuguese Marble & Granite Pty Limited t/a Euro Abrasives Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate