NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : United Well Investments Pty Limited v South Sydney City Council [2000] NSWLEC 126 APPLICANT: United Well Investments Pty Limited PARTIES : ACN 077 556 855
RESPONDENT: South Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10993 of 1999 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- application for modification of existing development consent - minor change with no external impact - either quantitative or qualitative approach - whether substantially the same development
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 96 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 16/05/2000 EX TEMPORE 05/16/2000 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT: C W McEwen (barrister) SOLICITORS: PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT E Ranken (solicitor) SOLICITORS: Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 10993 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Lloyd J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision date: 16 May 2000
United Well Investments Pty Limited ACN 077 556 855 Applicant
v
South Sydney City Council Respondent
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR: 1. This is an appeal under section 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ("the Act") against the refusal of an application to modify a development consent pursuant to s 96(2) of that Act.
2. The development consent for which modification is sought was a consent granted to DA U97-00438 for the construction of a ninety unit residential flat building, subsequently reduced to seventy-eight units, and a multi storey hotel having seven levels and containing 274 accommodation rooms, a restaurant, a tavern space, two conference rooms and basement parking, at 96-102 Bayswater Road, Rushcutters Bay.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate