NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Crewdson v Director General, NSW Department of Ageing Disability and Home Care-Department of Community Services [2006] NSWIRComm 185
APPLICANT: Mr Gerard Crewdson
FIRST RESPONDENT: Director General of NSW Department of Community Services PARTIES: Director General of Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care
SECOND RESPONDENT: Healthquest/Central Sydney Area Health Services
THIRD RESPONDENT: Ian Knight, NSW Crown Solicitor
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 477 of 2006
CORAM: Schmidt J; Kavanagh J; Staunton J
CATCHWORDS: Contempt - notice of motion - allegations of contempt against various respondents - respondents' motion seeking orders that proceedings be set aside or struck out - proper time for matters raised in respondents' motion - Rule 82 of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules - discretionary relief and abuse of process - scandalous material and Rule 13 of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules - respondents' motion not to be heard at this time other than in relation to scandalous material - costs reserved
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Bourot v NSW Dept of Public Works and Services & Anor [2001] NSWIRComm 257 Caltex Petroleum Pty Ltd & Others v Harmer (1999) 92 IR 264 Crewdson v Director Generals NSW Department of Ageing Disability and Home Care/Department of Community Services (No 12) [2005] NSWIRComm 426 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) & Others (1964) 112 CLR 125 Hyde v Energy Australia [1999] NSWIRComm 406 (unreported, 8 September 1999) CASES CITED: Majik Markets Pty Limited v Brake and Service Centre Drummoyne Pty Limited (1991) 28 NSWLR 443 Nagle (t/as W D and J L Nagle & Sons) v Tilburg & Anor (1993) 51 IR 8 Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1 R v Dunbabin; ex parte Williams (1935) 53 CLR 434 Taudevin v Egis Consulting Australia Pty Ltd and Anor (2000) 97 IR 165 Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd & Anor (1990) 171 CLR 538 Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gibson (2001) 109 IR 359
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate