NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 115 LGERA 215
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Kanne Pty Limited v Botany Bay City Council [2001] NSWLEC 163 APPLICANT Kanne Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Botany Bay City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10073 of 2001 CORAM: McEwen AJ Development Application - Planning Instruments :- KEY ISSUES: Permissibility under LEP - primary and secondary objectives Merit considerations noise and vibration - solar access - density LEGISLATION CITED: Challister Ltd v Blacktown City Council (1992) 76 LGRA 10; Coffs Harbour Environment Centre Inc v Coffs Harbour City Council (1991) 74 LGRA 185; CASES CITED: Hutcheson v Ryde Municipal Council (1969) 17 LGRA 45; North Sydney Municipal Council v PD Mayoh Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 740; Schaffer Corporation Ltd v Hawkesbury City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 21 DATES OF HEARING: 9/07/2001, 10/07/2001, 11/07/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/27/2001
APPLICANT Mr B Goldsmith (Agent)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr T Hale SC
SOLICITORS Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND 10073 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT McEwen AJ OF NEW SOUTH WALES 27 July 2001
Kanne Pty Limited Applicant v Botany Bay City Council Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate