NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Chong v Berry [2007] NSWLC 33 JURISDICTION: Civil PARTIES: Moe-Ava Chong Nicole Berry FILE NUMBER: 4338/06 PLACE OF HEARING: Downing Centre DATE OF DECISION: 12/20/2007 MAGISTRATE: Magistrate H Dillon CATCHWORDS: Damages – Quantum – Quantification of loss of use of motor vehicle after traffic accident – Quantification of loss in period before hiring replacement vehicle – Quantification of loss during period in which hire car used – "Market rate" -- Receipt of non-compensable benefits – Entitlement to claim collision damage waiver fee – Pre-judgment interest - Evidence – Onus of proof – Rebuttable assumption that invoice for hire of car corresponds with market rate – Matters that rebut presumption – Lack of "straightforwardness" Civil Liability Act 2002 LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Local Courts Act 1982 Admiralty Commissioners v SS Susequehanna ("The Susequehanna") [1926] AC 655 Alexander v Lang [1967] Scots LT (Sheriff Court R) 64 Athanasopoulos v Moseley (2001) 52 NSWLR 262 Banco de Portugal v Waterlow & Sons Ltd [1932] AC 452 Batchelor v Burke (1981) 148 CLR 448 Bee v Jenson [2006] EWHC 3359 (Comm) British Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 Burdis v Livsey [2003] QB 36 Dimond v Lovell [2002] 1 AC 384 Fire and All Risks Insurance Co Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 427 Fung v Stocavaz [2006] NSWSC 1345; (2007) ANZ Insurance Cases 61-730. CASES CITED: Giles v Thompson [1994] 1 AC 142 The Greta Holme [1897] AC 596 J&E Hall Ltd v Barclay [1937] 3 All ER 620 Lagden v O'Connor [2004] 1 AC 1067 Lodge Holes Colliery Co Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1908] AC 323 Marcic v Davies (20 Feb 1985) Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Owners of the SS Marpessa ("The Marpessa") [1907] AC 241 Patel v London Transport Executive [1981] RTR 29 Radford v De Froberville [1977] 1WLR 1262 Reid v Brown (1952) WN(NSW) 131 Screenco Pty Ltd v RL Dew Pty Ltd (2003) 58 NSWLR 720 Solomon Pacific Resources NL v Acacia Resources Ltd (1996) 19 ACSR 677 Stanton v Drayton Commercial Investment Co [1983] 1 AC 501 Mr M. Hodges (Counsel for Plaintiff ) REPRESENTATION: Anne Finnerty & Assoc (Solicitors for Plaintiff) Mr K. Oliver (Counsel for Defendant) Mason Black Lawyers (Solicitors for Defendant) ORDERS: Verdict and judgment for plaintiff in sum of $1136.75. Costs reserved.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate