NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Julie Pritchard v Measurement Resources Pty Limited [2006] NSWIRComm 1151
APPLICANT Julie Pritchard PARTIES: RESPONDENT Measurement Resources Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): 6105 of 2005
CORAM: Macdonald C
CATCHWORDS: Application for relief from victimisation - out of time application - several months - representative error defence - Applicant also responsbile for delay - hardship to the Respondent - prospects of success - exercise of Commission's discretion - out of time application rejected.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
CASES CITED: Alley v Camnex Pty Limited t/as Combined Nursery Sales [2005] NSWIRComm 357 Hurrell v Queensland Cotton Corporation Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 139
HEARING DATES: 15/08/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/23/2006
APPLICANT Mr S Jolly, solicitor LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Boyle, solicitor
DECISION: - 19 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: MACDONALD C
23 November 2006
Matter No IRC 6105 of 2006
Julie Pritchard and Measurement Resources Pty Limited
Application by Julie Pritchard for relief from victimisation pursuant to section 213 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
PRELIMINARY DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm 1151
1 The Commission has before it an application by Julie Pritchard ("the Applicant") for relief from victimisation against Measurement Resources Pty Limited ("the Respondent") pursuant to section 213 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 ("the Act"). 2 This Preliminary Decision arises from an Out Of Time issue pursued by the Respondent. 3 This section 213 application was filed on 24 November 2006. (The Applicant had also filed a section 84 unfair dismissal application against the same Respondent: IRC 05/1886. That file was arbitrated on 16 November 2005 and 27 March 2006 and a decision in that matter was handed down after the Commission had considered the evidence and submissions about the Out Of Time issue in this present s213 application: IRC 6105/05). 4 At the Out of Time Hearing the Respondent was represented by Mr J Boyle, solicitor.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate