NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Boyd and Anor v Maxx Implementation Pty Limited and Ors (No 3) [2008] NSWIRComm 200 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
LINDSAY DOUGLAS BOYD First Applicant
FINGER LIMEING GOOD PTY LIMITED (FORMERLY ALCONLEIGH PTY LIMITED) (ACN 076 969 465) AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ALCONLEIGH TRUST Second Applicant
MAXX IMPLEMENTATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 073 058 849) First Respondent
PARTIES: MAXX PTY LIMITED (ACN 098 422 354) Second Respondent
GERHARD MARTIN LUDWIG Third Respondent
EBENEZER GUMNUT PTY LIMITED (ACN 073 555 898) AS TRUSTEE FOR THE GM LUDWIG FAMILY DISCRETIONARY TRUST Fourth Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1509 of 2004
CORAM: Schmidt J
Costs - whether any costs order to be made in favour of second applicant - order made - indemnity costs order in favour of applicants reflective of offer of compromise - offer to be regarded as Calderbank offer - respondents acted unreasonably in refusing offer - misconduct of respondents also considered - misconduct of applicants considered - costs in relation to profit share claim ordered in favour of applicants, given success in demonstrating unfairness CATCHWORDS: Orders - orders in favour of second applicant reflective of conclusions reached as to unfairness of contract - interest - no order for interest reflective of applicants' delay in pursuing case - money orders against third respondent in relation to profit share claim refused - orders otherwise as agreed to reflect judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate