NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : R & W Realty Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2000] NSWLEC 167 APPLICANT PARTIES : R & W Realty Pty Ltd RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue FILE NUMBER(S) : 30229 of 1999 CORAM: Sheahan J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- in Class 3 - whether exceptional circumstances - should Practice Direction be amended - should Practice Direction be applied - costs of notice of motion for costs Land Tax Management Act 1956 s 38A LEGISLATION CITED: Practice Direction 1993 par 10A Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Tax Administration Act 1996 s 100 Dunne v CCSR [2000] NSWLEC 52; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; Logwon Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1993) 82 LGERA 158; MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council (No.2) (2000) 107 LGERA 211; Maurici v CCSR (No.3) (2000) 107 LGERA 222; CASES CITED: Murray Publishers Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (1994) 84 LGERA 13; NAP NAP Station Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (1989) 72 LGRA 275; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Outdoor Australia Pty Ltd v Auburn Council (1996) 89 LGERA 365; Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs, ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; Thomson Landscape & Garden Supplies Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2000] NSWLEC 59; Valuer General (SA) v Fenton Nominees Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 160 DATES OF HEARING: 28/07/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/10/2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate