NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: DPP v MOURCHED [2010] NSWLC 2
JURISDICTION: Criminal
PARTIES: Director of Public Prosecutions Tony Mourched
FILE NUMBER:
PLACE OF HEARING: Downing Centre
DATE OF DECISION: 03/23/2010
MAGISTRATE: Chief Magistrate G L Henson
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Publish a False Statement for Financial Advantage
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Procedure Act 1986
Cobiac –v- Liddy (1969) 119 CLR 257 Dodd –v- R [2010] QCA 31 R –v- Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 R –v- Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 R –v- Doan (2000) 50 NSWLR 115 R –v- El Rashid (unrep, 7/4/95, NSWCCA) CASES CITED: R –v-Ingrassia 41 NSWLR 447 R –v- Mears (1991) 53 A Crim R 141 R –v- Mungomery (2004) 151 A Crim R at [40] R –v- Seiler [2003] QCA 217 R –v- Taylor [2000] NSWCCA 442 R –v- Thomson & Houlten (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Thornloe –v- Filipowski 52 NSWLR 60
TEXTS CITED:
REPRESENTATION:
ORDERS:
Remarks on Sentence
1. The offender is charged with Publishing a False Statement for a Financial Advantage. The Prosecution is brought pursuant to Section 178BB(1) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty for the offence is 5 years imprisonment. The value of the financial advantage tainted by the offender's conduct is $955,620. As the value of the advantage is in excess of $5,000.00 the offence falls within Table 1 of Section 267 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986. The maximum jurisdictional penalty that may be imposed in the Local Court is 2 years imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate