NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Haropula & Lismore Neighbourhood Centre Inc [2008] NSWIRComm 1023
APPLICANT: PARTIES: Mr M. Haropula RESPONDENT Lismore Neighbourhood Centre Inc
FILE NUMBER(S): 2069 of 2007
CORAM: Ritchie C
Termination of employment-Unfair dismissal claim Not settled at conciliation-directions given for filing and serving of evidence-dates given for Hearing. Evidenced filed by both parties CATCHWORDS: Applicant's legal representative filed a Notice of Change of Solicitor No appearance by applicant on day of Hearing. Commission wrote to applicant to enquire as to why no appearance, given 21 days to reply. No reply received. Commission dismissed application under Rule 222of the Act for want of prosecution.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 12/02/08
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7 March 2008
APPLICANT: Mr M. Haropula LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr M. Felle Jobs Australia
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: RITCHIE C
7 March, 2008
Matter No IRC 2069 of 2007
Mava Haropula and Lismore Neighbourhood Centre Inc
Application by Mava Haropula re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
D E C I S I O N
[2008] NSWIRComm 1023
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate